This would be much better as the code is sized to 1x1 px and wont “snap” from big to small while loading … if you know what i mean style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif
Because i am oldschool style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif lol
Also my code works even with very old browsers style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif
But what i would know very hardly is:
WHYYYY isnt there any width=“1” height=“1” image sizing or even the p style=“display:none;” included in the original piwik code ???
Generally, any “weird movement” at the bottom of the page is going to go unnoticed as this is in a noscript block. Bots, lynx, and barely functional mobile web browsers fall in this category.
… does he even counts the image call? Does he calls the image even if display is none? … does piwik still counts the visitor (who visits the site with disabled javascript)?
[quote=eugen723674 @ Oct 12 2009, 09:42 PM]Because i am oldschool style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif lol
Also my code works even with very old browsers style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif
But what i would know very hardly is:
WHYYYY isnt there any width=“1” height=“1” image sizing or even the p style=“display:none;” included in the original piwik code ???[/quote]
the width=1 and height=1 are not set in the Javascript in order to allow plugins to return an image of any size in the noscript - for example, there could be a plugin returning a visitor counter or other images (flag of the visitor, visitor IP, etc.)